Critical Analysis of the Ethical Use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) by Legal Practitioners in South Africa: Comparative Lessons from Germany and France

Usenathi Phindelo – Paul T. Mtunuse

Full Text of Paper

Issue of Scientific Journal No. 2025-04
Read paper (PDF)

  • Source Type: Journal
  • Document Type: Study
  • Document Language: English
  • Published on: 31. 12. 2025
  • File Format: PDF
  • File Size: 723 kB

In: Societas et iurisprudentia • 2025 • Volume 13 • Issue 4 • Pages 19-43 • ISSN 1339-5467

Abstract: This study critically analyses the ethical use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) by legal practitioners in the South African courts. The study uses doctrinal research methodology to examine primary and secondary sources. It explores the intersection between emerging technologies and professional ethics, raising key questions about lawyers’ honesty, responsibility, and accountability in an era where algorithmic tools are increasingly used in litigation. An analysis of existing South African statutory frameworks reveals a regulatory gap. This study proposes the inclusion of AI-specific standards in professional regulations. The paper compares the application of AI in the South African courts with that in the European Union countries, specifically Germany and France. The study concludes that reform is urgently needed to preserve judicial integrity and uphold public confidence in the legal system.

Key Words: Legal Ethics; Artificial Intelligence; Legal Practitioners; Professional Responsibility; Hallucinated Citation; Courts; Plagiarism; Cheating; Germany; France; South Africa.

ORCID: ORCID iDhttps://orcid.org/0009-0003-8940-3542

ORCID: ORCID iDhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-1469-7956

DOI: https://doi.org/10.31262/1339-5467/2025/13/4/19-43

URL: https://sei.iuridica.truni.sk/archive/2025/04/SEI-2025-04-Studies-Phindelo-Usenathi-Mtunuse-Paul-T.pdf

CopyrightCopyright © 2025 Usenathi Phindelo – Paul T. Mtunuse

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Bibliographic Citation

PHINDELO, U. and P. T. MTUNUSE. Critical Analysis of the Ethical Use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) by Legal Practitioners in South Africa: Comparative Lessons from Germany and France. Societas et iurisprudentia [online]. 2025, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 19-43 [cit. 2020-01-01]. ISSN 1339-5467. Available at: https://doi.org/10.31262/1339-5467/2025/13/4/19-43.

References

AI in Legal Research under Scrutiny after Fake Case Citations. In: Moonstone Information Refinery [online]. 2025-01-13 [cit. 2025-11-04]. Available at: https://www.moonstone.co.za/ai-in-legal-research-under-scrutiny-after-fake-case-citations/.

AI Principles. In: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development [online]. 2025 [cit. 2025-11-04]. Available at: https://www.oecd.org/en/topics/ai-principles.html.

Artificial Intelligence: The Action Plan of the CNIL. In: CNIL – Commission Nationale de l’Informatique et des Libertés [online]. 2023-05-16 [cit. 2025-11-04]. Available at: https://www.cnil.fr/en/artificial-intelligence-action-plan-cnil.

BATOOL, A., D. ZOWGHI and M. BANO. AI Governance: A Systematic Literature Review. AI and Ethics [online]. 2025, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 3265-3279 [cit. 2025-11-04]. ISSN 2730-5961. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s43681-024-00653-w.

BERNSTEIN, D. and D. RAMJEE. AI Watch: Global Regulatory Tracker – South Africa. In: White & Case [online]. 2024-12-03 [cit. 2025-11-04]. Available at: https://www.whitecase.com/insight-our-thinking/ai-watch-global-regulatory-tracker-south-africa.

Case of Ayinde v. London Borough of Haringey, and Hamad Al-Haroun v. Qatar National Bank QPSC and QNB Capital LLC [2025-06-06]. Judgement of the High Court of England and Wales, 2025, [2025] EWHC 1383 (Admin).

Case of Mavundla v. MEC: Department of Co-operative Government and Traditional Affairs KwaZulu-Natal and Others [2025-01-08]. Judgement of the High Court of South Africa, 2025, 7940/2024P.

Case of Northbound Processing (Pty) Ltd v. South African Diamond and Precious Metals Regulator and Others [2025-06-30]. Judgement of the High Court of South Africa, 2025, 2025-072038.

Case of Parker v. Forsyth NO and Others [2023-06-29]. Judgement of the High Court of South Africa, 2023, 1585/20.

Case of Van der Berg v. General Council of the Bar of South Africa [2007-03-22]. Judgement of the Supreme Court of Appeal of South Africa, 2007, 270/06.

CHEONG, B. Ch. Transparency and Accountability in AI Systems: Safeguarding Wellbeing in the Age of Algorithmic Decision-making. Frontiers in Human Dynamics [online]. 2024, vol. 6, pp. 1-11 [cit. 2025-11-04]. ISSN 2673-2726. Available at: https://doi.org/10.3389/fhumd.2024.1421273.

Code of Conduct for All Legal Practitioners, Candidate Legal Practitioners and Juristic Entities [2019]. Government Gazette of the Republic of South Africa, 2019, No. 42337.

Code of Judicial Ethics [online]. 1st ed. The Hague: International Criminal Court, 2022. 4 p. [cit. 2025-11-04]. ISBN 92-9227-372-8. Available at: https://www.icc-cpi.int/publications/official-journal/code-judicial-ethics.

Constitution of the Republic of South Africa Act No. 108 [1996].

Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms [European Convention on Human Rights] [1950-11-04].

Electronic Communications and Transactions Act No. 25 [2002].

GLEICH, M. Digitalisation of Civil Proceedings in Germany. In: Norton Rose Fulbright [online]. 2022-11-08 [cit. 2025-11-04]. Available at: https://www.nortonrosefulbright.com/en/knowledge/publications/3bc3c34a/digitalisation-of-civil-proceedings-in-germany.

Grundgesetz für die Bundesrepublik Deutschland [Basic Law for the Federal Republic of Germany] [1949-05-23].

HASNEZIRI, L. The Adversarial Proceedings Principle in the Civil Process. European Journal of Marketing and Economics [online]. 2021, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 88-102 [cit. 2025-11-04]. ISSN 2601-8667. Available at: https://doi.org/10.26417/548nth20i.

HÖSCH, A., M. SCHRADER and P. G. ZICKERT. The Evolving Role of AI in German Dispute Resolution. In: Hengeler Mueller News [online]. 2025-01-30 [cit. 2025-11-04]. Available at: https://hengeler-news.com/en/articles/the-evolving-role-of-ai-in-german-dispute-resolution.

International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights [ICCPR] [1966-12-16].

KHAMITOVA, D. and S. SACHDEV. AI and Arbitration: A Perspective from France. In: Clyde & Co [online]. 2025-07-31 [cit. 2025-11-04]. Available at: https://www.clydeco.com/en/insights/2025/08/ai-and-arbitration-a-perspective-from-france.

KHAN, A. A., M. A. AKBAR, M. FAHMIDEH, P. LIANG, M. WASEEM, A. AHMAD, M. NIAZI and P. ABRAHAMSSON. AI Ethics: An Empirical Study on the Views of Practitioners and Lawmakers. IEEE Transactions on Computational Social Systems [online]. 2023, vol. 10, no. 6, pp. 2971-2984 [cit. 2025-11-04]. ISSN 2329-924X. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1109/tcss.2023.3251729.

Legal Practice Act No. 28 [2014].

Loi n° 92-597 du 1er juillet 1992 relative au code de la propriété intellectuelle (partie législative) [1992-07-01]. Journal Officiel de la République Française, 1992, n° 0153.

MAHOMED, N. and S.-N. SIDDIQI. Another Episode of Fabricated Citations, Real Repercussions: South African Courts Show No Tolerance for AI-hallucinated Cases. In: Cliffe Dekker Hofmeyr [online]. 2025-07-04 [cit. 2025-11-04]. Available at: https://www.cliffedekkerhofmeyr.com/en/news/publications/2025/Practice/Employment-Law/combined-employment-and-knowledge-management-alert-4-july-Another-episode-of-fabricated-citations-real-repercussions-South-African-courts-show-no-tolerance-for-AI-hallucinated-cases.

MATTHEE, J. and G. STOPFORTH. AI in the Courtroom: The Dangers of Using ChatGPT in Legal Practice in South Africa. In: The Conversation [online]. 2025-11-04 [cit. 2025-11-04]. Available at: https://doi.org/10.64628/AAJ.6cq6mrtgp.

MOKGOBU, A. Chief Justice Maya Urges ‘Careful Handling’ of AI in Courts. In: Jacaranda FM [online]. 2025-09-04 [cit. 2025-11-04]. Available at: https://www.jacarandafm.com/news/news/chief-justice-maya-urges-careful-handling-ai-courts/.

MOYO, A. Lawyers Face Probe for Using ‘Hallucinating’ GenAI in Court. In: ITWeb [online]. 2025-07-02 [cit. 2025-11-04]. Available at: https://www.itweb.co.za/article/lawyers-face-probe-for-using-hallucinating-genai-in-court/Pero3MZ3221qQb6m.

MULEYA, P. Can Machines Argue the Law? Reassessing AI’s Role in Legal Opinions and Heads of Argument under POPIA. De Rebus [online]. 2025-05-01 [cit. 2025-11-04]. ISSN 1605-6264. Available at: https://www.derebus.org.za/can-machines-argue-the-law-reassessing-ais-role-in-legal-opinions-and-heads-of-argument-under-popia/.

OLIPHANT, M. The Ethical Imperative of Verifying AI-generated Content in Legal Practice. De Rebus [online]. 2025-08-01 [cit. 2025-11-04]. ISSN 1605-6264. Available at: https://www.derebus.org.za/the-ethical-imperative-of-verifying-ai-generated-content-in-legal-practice/.

Ordonnance de référé du Tribunal judiciaire de Nanterre n° RG 24/01457 [2025-02-14].

PIETROPAOLI, I., I. ANASTASIADOU, J.-P. GAUCI and H. MacALPINE. Use of Artificial Intelligence in Legal Practice [online]. 1st ed. London: British Institute of International and Comparative Law, 2023. 14 p. [cit. 2025-11-04]. Available at: https://www.biicl.org/publications/use-of-artificial-intelligence-in-legal-practice.

Protection of Personal Information Act No. 4 [2013].

Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 June 2024 Laying Down Harmonised Rules on Artificial Intelligence and amending Regulations (EC) No. 300/2008, (EU) No. 167/2013, (EU) No. 168/2013, (EU) 2018/858, (EU) 2018/1139 and (EU) 2019/2144 and Directives 2014/90/EU, (EU) 2016/797 and (EU) 2020/1828 (Artificial Intelligence Act). OJ EU L, 2024/1689, 2024-07-12.

ROM, M. C., M. HIDAKA and R. BZOSTEK WALKER. Introduction to Political Science [online]. 1st ed. Houston: OpenStax, 2022, pp. 345-349 [cit. 2025-11-04]. ISBN 978-1-951693-56-5. Available at: https://openstax.org/details/books/introduction-political-science.

SNAIL KA MTUZE, S. and M. MORIGE. Towards Drafting Artificial Intelligence (AI) Legislation in South Africa. Obiter [online]. 2024, vol. 45, no. 1, pp. 161-179 [cit. 2025-11-04]. ISSN 2709-555X. Available at: https://doi.org/10.17159/obiter.v45i1.18399.

South Africa National Artificial Intelligence Policy Framework [online]. 1st ed. Pretoria: Department of Communications and Digital Technologies, 2024. 13 p. [cit. 2025-11-04]. Available at: https://www.dcdt.gov.za/sa-national-ai-policy-framework/file/338-sa-national-ai-policy-framework.html.

South African Courts Weigh in on the Ethical Use of Artificial Intelligence in Legal Practice. In: VDMA Law [online]. 2025-08-06 [cit. 2025-11-04]. Available at: https://vdmalaw.com/2025/08/06/south-african-courts-weigh-in-on-the-ethical-use-of-artificial-intelligence-in-legal-practice/.

STEWART, K. Responsible AI Use in South African Legal Practice: A Call for Ethical Guidelines. In: Polity [online]. 2025-10-29 [cit. 2025-11-04]. Available at: https://www.polity.org.za/article/responsible-ai-use-in-south-african-legal-practice-a-call-for-ethical-guidelines-2025-10-29.

THALDAR, D., S. MBATHA, M. BOTES and P. ESSELAAR. Responsible AI Use in South African Legal Practice: A Call for Ethical Guidelines. De Rebus [online]. 2025-07-01 [cit. 2025-11-04]. ISSN 1605-6264. Available at: https://www.derebus.org.za/responsible-ai-use-in-south-african-legal-practice-a-call-for-ethical-guidelines/.

Van der VYVER, C. Guidelines for Responsible AI Integration in Legal Practice. De Rebus [online]. 2025-05-01 [cit. 2025-11-04]. ISSN 1605-6264. Available at: https://www.derebus.org.za/guidelines-for-responsible-ai-integration-in-legal-practice/.

Van ECK, M. AI ‘Hallucinations’ Are Threatening the Administration of Justice in SA. In: Daily Maverick [online]. 2025-07-15 [cit. 2025-11-04]. Available at: https://www.dailymaverick.co.za/opinionista/2025-07-15-ai-hallucinations-are-threatening-the-administration-of-justice-in-sa/.

Van ECK, M. Expanding Ethical and Professional Guidelines: The Use of Artificial Intelligence in the Legal Profession. De Rebus [online]. 2025-09-01 [cit. 2025-11-04]. ISSN 1605-6264. Available at: https://www.derebus.org.za/expanding-ethical-and-professional-guidelines-the-use-of-artificial-intelligence-in-the-legal-profession/.

WANG, W. An Analysis of the Feasibility of Artificial Intelligence to Replace Lawyers. Advances in Politics and Economics [online]. 2023, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 161-172 [cit. 2025-11-04]. ISSN 2576-1390. Available at: https://doi.org/10.22158/ape.v6n2p161.