Bureaucratic Actors vs Legitimate Actors: Explaining the Choice of Interim Presidents in Filling the Dual Vacance of the President and the Vice President

Febriansyah Ramadhan – Setyo Widagdo – Aan Eko Widiarto – Riana Susmayanti

Full Text of Paper

Issue of Scientific Journal No. 2024-02
Read paper (PDF)

  • Source Type: Journal
  • Document Type: Study
  • Document Language: English
  • Published on: 30. 6. 2024
  • File Format: PDF
  • File Size: 903 kB

In: Societas et iurisprudentia • 2024 • Volume 12 • Issue 2 • Pages 19-59 • ISSN 1339-5467

Abstract: One of the difficult situations in government occurs due to the double vacancy of the President and Vice President offices. The country’s constitution must navigate this vacuum by providing for an Interim President to temporarily lead the government until a new President and Vice President are elected. In the constitutions of various countries, there are two models of Interim President, some give mandate to bureaucratic actors (Prime Ministers/Ministers) and some give mandate to legitimate actors (legislature of House of Representatives/Senate) to step up as Interim President. This paper aims to explain these two models in terms of filling public positions and presidentialism settings. The results of this study will be able to showcase the strengths and weaknesses of bureaucratic actors and legitimate actors when serving as Interim President, which supported with experience from various countries. With the help of socio-legal methods, this paper closes the theoretical gap in the constitutional and political law literature which has not explained these two models. Our paper shows that both have advantages in different aspects: the bureaucrat actor is superior in terms of policy because he was involved in the previous Government Cabinet, while the legitimate actor is superior in terms of politics because he has democratic legitimacy and was elected by the people and political parties. What is a weakness for one actor, becomes an advantage for the other.

Key Words: Constitutional Law; Constitution; Interim President; President; Power Vacancy; Presidentialism; Parliamentarism; Bureauctaric Actor; Legitimate Actor.

ORCID: ORCID iDhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-5125-1609

ORCID: ORCID iDhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-8241-1983

ORCID: ORCID iDhttps://orcid.org/0009-0001-2720-6063

ORCID: ORCID iDhttps://orcid.org/0009-0009-5123-4943

DOI: https://doi.org/10.31262/1339-5467/2024/12/2/19-59

URL: https://sei.iuridica.truni.sk/archive/2024/02/SEI-2024-02-Studies-Ramadhan-F-Widagdo-S-Widiarto-A-E-Susmayanti-R.pdf

CopyrightCopyright © 2024 Febriansyah Ramadhan – Setyo Widagdo – Aan Eko Widiarto – Riana Susmayanti

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Bibliographic Citation

RAMADHAN, F., S. WIDAGDO, A. E. WIDIARTO and R. SUSMAYANTI. Bureaucratic Actors vs Legitimate Actors: Explaining the Choice of Interim Presidents in Filling the Dual Vacance of the President and the Vice President. Societas et iurisprudentia [online]. 2024, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 19-59 [cit. 2020-01-01]. ISSN 1339-5467. Available at: https://doi.org/10.31262/1339-5467/2024/12/2/19-59.

References

ACKERMAN, B. The New Separation of Powers. Harvard Law Review [online]. 2000, vol. 113, no. 3, pp. 633-729 [cit. 2024-05-02]. ISSN 2161-976X. Available at: https://doi.org/10.2307/1342286.

ALBERT, R. The Constitutional Politics of Presidential Succession. Hofstra Law Review [online]. 2011, vol. 39, no. 3, pp. 497-576 [cit. 2024-05-02]. ISSN 0091-4029. Available at: https://scholarlycommons.law.hofstra.edu/hlr/vol39/iss3/2/.

ALBERT, R. The Fusion of Presidentialism and Parliamentarism. The American Journal of Comparative Law [online]. 2009, vol. 57, no. 3, pp. 531-578 [cit. 2024-05-02]. ISSN 2326-9197. Available at: https://doi.org/10.5131/ajcl.2008.0016.

ALEXIADOU, D. Ideologues, Partisans, and Loyalists: Cabinet Ministers and Social Welfare Reform in Parliamentary Democracies. Comparative Political Studies [online]. 2015, vol. 48, no. 8, pp. 1051-1086 [cit. 2024-05-02]. ISSN 1552-3829. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414015574880.

AMAR, A. R. and V. D. AMAR. Is the Presidential Succession Law Constitutional?. Stanford Law Review [online]. 1995, vol. 48, no. 1, pp. 113-139 [cit. 2024-05-02]. ISSN 0038-9765. Available at: https://doi.org/10.2307/1229151.

ANWAR, D. F. The Habibie Presidency: Catapulting towards Reform. In: E. ASPINALL and G. FEALY, eds. Soeharto’s New Order and Its Legacy: Essays in Honour of Harold Crouch [online]. 1st ed. Canberra: ANU Press, 2010, pp. 99-117 [cit. 2024-05-02]. Asian Studies Series. ISBN 978-1-921666-47-6. Available at: https://doi.org/10.22459/snol.08.2010.07.

ARIYANTO, B. and R. M. KAFRAWI. Orderly Principles of State Administration in Selecting Ministers. Legality: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum [online]. 2022, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 12-28 [cit. 2024-05-02]. ISSN 2549-4600. Available at: https://doi.org/10.22219/ljih.v30i1.15868.

ARSIL, F. Teori Sistem Pemerintahan: Pergeseran Konsep dan Saling Kontribusi antar Sistem Pemerintahan di Berbagai Negara. 1st ed. Depok: Rajawali Pers, 2017. 298 p. ISBN 978-602-425-078-2.

BARBER, J. D. The Presidential Character: Predicting Performance in the White House [online]. 4th ed. New York: Routledge, 2017. 544 p. [cit. 2024-05-02]. ISBN 978-1-351-22370-6. Available at: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351223706.

BOIN, A., P. ’t HART and F. van ESCH. Political Leadership in Times of Crisis: Comparing Leader Responses to Financial Turbulence. In: L. HELMS, ed. Comparative Political Leadership [online]. 1st ed. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2012, pp. 119-141 [cit. 2024-05-02]. ISBN 978-1-137-26491-6. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137264916_6.

BURKHARDT, F. Institutionalising Authoritarian Presidencies: Polymorphous Power and Russia’s Presidential Administration. Europe-Asia Studies [online]. 2021, vol. 73, no. 3, pp. 472-504 [cit. 2024-05-02]. ISSN 1465-3427. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/09668136.2020.1749566.

CALABRESI, S. G. and S. B. PRAKASH. The President’s Power to Execute the Laws. The Yale Law Journal [online]. 1994, vol. 104, no. 3, pp. 541-665 [cit. 2024-05-02]. ISSN 0044-0094. Available at: https://doi.org/10.2307/797113.

CALABRESI, S. G. The Political Question of Presidential Succession. Stanford Law Review [online]. 1995, vol. 48, no. 1, pp. 155-175 [cit. 2024-05-02]. ISSN 0038-9765. Available at: https://doi.org/10.2307/1229153.

CAMPBELL BLACK, H. Black’s Law Dictionary: Definitions of the Terms and Phrases of American and English Jurisprudence, Ancient and Modern. 4th ed. Saint Paul: West Publishing Company, 1968. 1882 p.

CASH, J. T. The Isolated Presidency [online]. 1st ed. New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 2023. 258 p. [cit. 2024-05-02]. ISBN 978-0-19-766980-8. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197669778.001.0001.

Constitute. In: ConstituteProject.org [online]. 2024 [cit. 2024-05-02]. Available at: https://www.constituteproject.org/.

Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia [1945].

CROCKETT, D. A. The Contemporary Presidency: Unity in the Executive and the Presidential Succession Act. Presidential Studies Quarterly [online]. 2004, vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 394-411 [cit. 2024-05-02]. ISSN 1741-5705. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-5705.2004.00050.x.

DAHL, R. A. Reflections on Opposition in Western Democracies. Government and Opposition [online]. 1965, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 7-24 [cit. 2024-05-02]. ISSN 1477-7053. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-7053.1965.tb00362.x.

FEERICK, J. D. From Failing Hands: The Story of Presidential Succession. 1st ed. New York: Fordham University Press, 1965. 368 p.

FEERICK, J. D. Presidential Inability: Filling in the Gaps. Politics and the Life Sciences [online]. 2014, vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 11-36 [cit. 2024-05-02]. ISSN 1471-5457. Available at: https://doi.org/10.2990/33_2_11.

FIEDLER, F. E. The Leadership Situation and the Black Box in Contingency Theories. In: M. M. CHEMERS and R. AYMAN, eds. Leadership Theory and Research: Perspectives and Directions. 2nd ed. San Diego: Academic Press, 1993, pp. 1-28. ISBN 0-12-170609-5.

FORTIER, J. C. and N. J. ORNSTEIN. Presidential Succession and Congressional Leaders. Catholic University Law Review [online]. 2004, vol. 53, no. 4, pp. 993-1014 [cit. 2024-05-02]. ISSN 0008-8390. Available at: https://scholarship.law.edu/lawreview/vol53/iss4/5/.

FRANKENBERG, G. Constitutional Transfer: The IKEA Theory Revisited. International Journal of Constitutional Law [online]. 2010, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 563-579 [cit. 2024-05-02]. ISSN 1474-2659. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/moq023.

GATES, R. M. Duty: Memoirs of a Secretary at War. 1st ed. New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 2014. 618 p. ISBN 978-0-307-95947-8.

GREENSTEIN, F. I. Personality and Politics: Problems of Evidence, Inference, and Conceptualization. 1st ed. Chicago: Markham Publishing Company, 1969. 200 p.

HAMDANI, F. and A. FAUZIA. Legal Discourse: The Spirit of Democracy and Human Rights Post Simultaneous Regional Elections 2020 in the Covid-19 Pandemic Era. Lex Scientia Law Review [online]. 2021, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 97-118 [cit. 2024-05-02]. ISSN 2598-9685. Available at: https://doi.org/10.15294/lesrev.v5i1.45887.

HANAN, D. Petugas Partai versus Presidensialisasi Politik. In: SINDOnews.com [online]. 2023-07-10 [cit. 2024-05-02]. Available at: https://nasional.sindonews.com/read/1148515/18/petugas-partai-versus-presidensialisasi-politik-1688972822.

HINDLEY, D. Indonesian Politics 1965-7: The September 30 Movement and the Fall of Sukarno. The World Today [online]. 1968, vol. 24, no. 8, pp. 345-356 [cit. 2024-05-02]. ISSN 2059-7495. Available at: https://www.jstor.org/stable/40394159.

INGBER, R. Bureaucratic Resistance and the National Security State. Iowa Law Review [online]. 2018, vol. 104, no. 1, pp. 139-221 [cit. 2024-05-02]. ISSN 0021-0552. Available at: https://ilr.law.uiowa.edu/print/volume-103-issue-6/bureaucratic-resistance-and-the-national-security-state.

JOUET, M. The Failed Invigoration of Argentina’s Constitution: Presidential Omnipotence, Repression, Instability, and Lawlessness in Argentine History. University of Miami Inter-American Law Review [online]. 2008, vol. 39, no. 3, pp. 409-462 [cit. 2024-05-02]. ISSN 2328-4242. Available at: https://repository.law.miami.edu/umialr/vol39/iss3/2/.

KALLENBACH, J. E. The New Presidential Succession Act. American Political Science Review [online]. 1947, vol. 41, no. 5, pp. 931-941 [cit. 2024-05-02]. ISSN 1537-5943. Available at: https://doi.org/10.2307/1950197.

KANE, J. and H. PATAPAN. The Democratic Leader: How Democracy Defines, Empowers, & Limits Its Leaders [online]. 1st ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012. 207 p. [cit. 2024-05-02]. ISBN 978-0-19-173907-1. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199650477.001.0001.

KELLER, J. W. Leadership Styles of Political Executives. In: R. B. ANDEWEG, R. ELGIE, L. HELMS, J. KAARBO and F. MÜLLER-ROMMEL, eds. The Oxford Handbook of Political Executives [online]. 1st ed. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 2020, pp. 481-500 [cit. 2024-05-02]. ISBN 978-0-19-184676-2. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198809296.013.18.

KIM, J. W. Korean Constitutional Court and Constitutionalism in Political Dynamics: Focusing on Presidential Impeachment. Constitutional Review [online]. 2018, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 222-248 [cit. 2024-05-02]. ISSN 2548-3870. Available at: https://doi.org/10.31078/consrev423.

KULISH, N. Acting President in Poland Wins a Narrow Victory. In: The New York Times [online]. 2010-07-04 [cit. 2024-05-02]. Available at: https://www.nytimes.com/2010/07/05/world/europe/05poland.html.

KURSKA, J. Quo vadis, Polonia?. La Vie des idées [online]. 2016-06-22 [cit. 2024-05-02]. ISSN 2105-3030. Available at: https://laviedesidees.fr/Quo-vadis-Poloniae.html.

LIJPHART, A. Democracy in the 21st Century: Can We Be Optimistic?. European Review [online]. 2001, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 169-184 [cit. 2024-05-02]. ISSN 1474-0575. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1062798701000163.

LINZ, J. J. The Perils of Presidentialism. Journal of Democracy [online]. 1990, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 51-69 [cit. 2024-05-02]. ISSN 1086-3214. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.2005.0026.

MAINWARING, S. and M. S. SHUGART. Juan Linz, Presidentialism, and Democracy: A Critical Appraisal. Comparative Politics [online]. 1997, vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 449-471 [cit. 2024-05-02]. ISSN 2151-6227. Available at: https://doi.org/10.2307/422014.

MAINWARING, S. Presidentialism in Latin America. Latin American Research Review [online]. 1990, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 157-179 [cit. 2024-05-02]. ISSN 1542-4278. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0023879100023256.

MAKOWER, H. United States Economic Policy and International Relations. The Economic Journal [online]. 1953, vol. 63, no. 250, pp. 450-452 [cit. 2024-05-02]. ISSN 1468-0297. Available at: https://doi.org/10.2307/2227155.

MANAN, B. Teori dan Politik Konstitusi. 1st ed. Jakarta: Direktorat Jenderal Pendidikan Tinggi, Departemen Pendidikan Nasional, 2000. 164 p. ISBN 979-8439-26-0.

MANNING, J. F. Not Proved: Some Lingering Questions about Presidential Succession. Stanford Law Review [online]. 1995, vol. 48, no. 1, pp. 141-153 [cit. 2024-05-02]. ISSN 0038-9765. Available at: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2854357.

MARIJAN, K. Sistem Politik Indonesia: Konsolidasi Demokrasi Pasca-Orde Baru. 5th ed. Jakarta: Kencana, 2016. 364 p. ISBN 978-602-8730-16-7.

MICHAELS, J. D. Of Constitutional Custodians and Regulatory Rivals: An Account of the Old and New Separation of Powers. New York University Law Review [online]. 2016, vol. 91, no. 2, pp. 227-291 [cit. 2024-05-02]. ISSN 2766-0834. Available at: https://www.nyulawreview.org/issues/volume-91-number-2/of-constitutional-custodians-and-regulatory-rivals-an-account-of-the-old-and-new-separation-of-powers/.

MIETZNER, M. How Indonesia Won a Constitution. Journal of Democracy [online]. 2014, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 171-175 [cit. 2024-05-02]. ISSN 1086-3214. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.2014.0023.

Militer Sudan Kudeta Pemerintahan Transisi. In: Deutsche Welle [online]. 2021-10-25 [cit. 2024-05-02]. Available at: https://www.dw.com/id/militer-sudan-kudeta-pemerintahan-transisi/a-59615407.

MOE, T. M. and M. CALDWELL. The Institutional Foundations of Democratic Government: A Comparison of Presidential and Parliamentary Systems. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics [online]. 1994, vol. 150, no. 1, pp. 171-195 [cit. 2024-05-02]. ISSN 1614-0559. Available at: https://www.jstor.org/stable/40753031.

MULUK, H. Demokrasi Presidensial dan Kepemimpinan Presidensial: Sebuah Assesmen Awal. Prisma. 2016, vol. 35, no. 3, pp. 104-114. ISSN 3048-3875.

NEGRETTO, G. L. Constitution-making and Institutional Design. The Transformations of Presidentialism in Argentina. European Journal of Sociology [online]. 1999, vol. 40, no. 2, pp. 193-232 [cit. 2024-05-02]. ISSN 1474-0583. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/s0003975600007451.

NORDLINGER, E. A. Soldiers in Politics: Military Coups and Governments. 1st ed. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1977. 224 p. ISBN 0-13-822163-4.

ODEGARD, P. H. Presidential Leadership and Party Responsibility. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science [online]. 1956, vol. 307, no. 1, pp. 66-81 [cit. 2024-05-02]. ISSN 1552-3349. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/000271625630700108.

OSTIGUY, P. Argentina’s Double Political Spectrum: Party System, Political Identities, and Strategies, 1944 – 2007 [online]. 1st ed. Notre Dame: The Helen Kellogg Institute for International Studies, 2009. 97 p. [cit. 2024-05-02]. Working Paper, no. 361. Available at: https://doi.org/10.7274/26126032.v1.

OUYANG, Y., E. T. HAGLUND and R. W. WATERMAN. The Missing Element: Examining the Loyalty-competence Nexus in Presidential Appointments. Presidential Studies Quarterly [online]. 2017, vol. 47, no. 1, pp. 62-91 [cit. 2024-05-02]. ISSN 1741-5705. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/psq.12346.

PENDERS, C. L. M. ed. Milestones on My Journey: The Memoirs of Ali Sastroamijoyo, Indonesian Patriot and Political Leader. 1st ed. St. Lucia: University of Queensland Press, 1979. 405 p. ISBN 0-7022-1206-7.

PIPER, J. R. “Situational Constitutionalism” and Presidential Power: The Rise and Fall of the Liberal Model of Presidential Government. Presidential Studies Quarterly [online]. 1994, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 577-594 [cit. 2024-05-02]. ISSN 1741-5705. Available at: https://www.jstor.org/stable/27551285.

RANKIN, R. S. Presidential Succession in the United States. The Journal of Politics [online]. 1946, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 44-56 [cit. 2024-05-02]. ISSN 1468-2508. Available at: https://doi.org/10.2307/2125607.

RIADHUSSYAH, M., F. FARHAN, F. HAMDANI and L. A. N. KUSUMA. The Dignity of Democracy in the Appointment of Acting Regional Heads by the President: Legal Construction after the Constitutional Court Decision Number 15/PUU-XX/2022. Jurnal Jurisprudence [online]. 2022, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 106-119 [cit. 2024-05-02]. ISSN 2549-5615. Available at: https://doi.org/10.23917/jurisprudence.v12i1.1044.

ROISMAN, S. Presidential Law. Minnesota Law Review [online]. 2021, vol. 105, no. 3, pp. 1269-1343 [cit. 2024-05-02]. ISSN 0026-5535. Available at: https://minnesotalawreview.org/article/presidential-law/.

SILVA, R. C. The Presidential Succession Act of 1947. Michigan Law Review [online]. 1949, vol. 47, no. 4, pp. 451-476 [cit. 2024-05-02]. ISSN 0026-2234. Available at: https://doi.org/10.2307/1284810.

SIMONTON, D. K. Presidential Leadership: Performance Criteria and Their Predictors. In: M. G. RUMSEY, ed. The Oxford Handbook of Leadership [online]. 1st ed. New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 2012, pp. 327-342 [cit. 2024-05-02]. Available at: ISBN 978-0-19-539879-3. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195398793.013.0019.

SKOWRONEK, S. The Politics Presidents Make: Leadership from John Adams to Bill Clinton. 2nd ed. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 1997. 546 p. ISBN 0-674-68937-2.

STEPAN, A. and C. SKACH. Constitutional Frameworks and Democratic Consolidation: Parliamentarianism versus Presidentialism. World Politics [online]. 1993, vol. 46, no. 1, pp. 1-22 [cit. 2024-05-02]. ISSN 1086-3338. Available at: https://doi.org/10.2307/2950664.

SURYADINATA, L. A Year of Upheaval and Uncertainty: The Fall of Soeharto and Rise of Habibie. In: D. SINGH and J. FUNSTON, eds. Southeast Asian Affairs [online]. 1st ed. Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies, 1999, pp. 111-127 [cit. 2024-05-02]. ISBN 978-981-230-689-0. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1355/9789812306890-010.

TILLMAN, S. B. Legislative Officer Succession to the Presidency [online]. 2010, pp. 1-29 [cit. 2024-05-02]. Available at: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.978878.

TULIS, J. K. The Rhetorical Presidency. 1st ed. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1987. 209 p. ISBN 0-691-07751-7.

TYLER, T. R. and E. A. LIND. A Relational Model of Authority in Groups. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology [online]. 1992, vol. 25, pp. 115-191 [cit. 2024-05-02]. ISSN 0065-2601. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0065-2601(08)60283-x.

Von BENDA-BECKMANN, F. and K. von BENDA-BECKMANN. Political and Legal Transformations of an Indonesian Polity: The Nagari from Colonisation to Decentralisation. 1st ed. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2013. 499 p. Cambridge Studies in Law and Society. ISBN 978-1-107-03859-2.

YOO, Ch. S., S. G. CALABRESI and A. J. COLANGELO. The Unitary Executive in the Modern Era, 1945 – 2004. Iowa Law Review. 2005, vol. 90, no. 2, pp. 601-732. ISSN 0021-0552.

ZED, M. Somewhere in the Jungle: Pemerintah Darurat Republik Indonesia: Sebuah Mata Rantai Sejarah Yang Terlupakan. 1st ed. Jakarta: Pustaka Utama Grafiti, 1997. 355 p. ISBN 979-444-399-9.