Andrei Zarafiu
Full Text of Paper
- Source Type: Journal
- Document Type: Study
- Document Language: English
- Published on: 30. 9. 2023
- File Format: PDF
- File Size: 676 kB
In: Societas et iurisprudentia • 2023 • Volume 11 • Issue 3 • Pages 19-33 • ISSN 1339-5467
Abstract: In the beginning of the current century, a new paradigm of assessing the rules in criminal proceedings has been emphasized, more specifically in those criminal cases in which a new trend in applying methodology of criminal sciences is arisen. There is no doubt that the new concept of preventing limitations in assessing the means of the forensics which are directly involved in the process of delivering the criminal decisions has already been accustomed. The current paper focuses on the new concepts of the forensics applicable in criminal proceedings, in such a manner not to exceed the legal framework of criminal procedure law, on the one hand, and to prevent any limitations which should be imposed, on the other hand. In this context, it has been observed that the methodology of investigation through means and instruments of the forensics has reached new dimensions, unavoidable ones. The culture of the forensics is, at the moment, of high interest for the judicial activity of criminal proceedings and, for this reason, a new approach in this matter is expected to be expressed by the legal doctrine in criminal matters.
Key Words: Criminal Law; Criminal Proceedings; Forensics; Tools of Investigation; Judicial Decision; Doctrinal Approach; Jurisprudence; Indictment Act; Judgment Solution; Romania.
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0932-9630
DOI: https://doi.org/10.31262/1339-5467/2023/11/3/19-33
URL: https://sei.iuridica.truni.sk/archive/2023/03/SEI-2023-03-Studies-Zarafiu-Andrei.pdf
Copyright © 2023 Andrei Zarafiu
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Bibliographic Citation
ZARAFIU, A. The Forensics in Criminal Proceedings: From Theory to Practice or How to Prevent Limitations. Societas et iurisprudentia [online]. 2023, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 19-33 [cit. 2020-01-01]. ISSN 1339-5467. Available at: https://doi.org/10.31262/1339-5467/2023/11/3/19-33.
References
ALLEN, R. J., J. L. HOFFMANN, D. A. LIVINGSTON, A. D. LEIPOLD and T. L. MEARES. Comprehensive Criminal Procedure. 5th ed. New York: Wolters Kluwer, 2020. 1776 p. Aspen Casebook Series. ISBN 978-1-5438-0436-2.
BIJU, A., K. HAMBLY and A. JOSHI. The Complexity of Forensic Science in Criminal Investigations: Is There a Gold Standard?. In: M. CLAYTON and N. ABBAS, eds. Voices of Forensic Science – Are We There Yet? The Golden Standards of Forensic Science [online]. 2021, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 7-26 [cit. 2023-08-10]. ISSN 2563-8874. Available at: https://jps.library.utoronto.ca/index.php/forensic/article/view/36288.
CARR, S., E. PIASECKI and A. GALLOP. Demonstrating Reliability through Transparency: A Scientific Validity Framework to Assist Scientists and Lawyers in Criminal Proceedings. Forensic Science International [online]. 2020, vol. 308, p. 110110 [cit. 2023-08-10]. ISSN 0379-0738. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2019.110110.
DANNECKER, G. Truth-finding as an Intermediate Goal of Criminal Proceedings and Its Limits. In: Á. FARKAS, G. DANNECKER and J. JACSÓ, eds. External, Internal and Criminal Investigations of Criminal Offences Affecting the Financial Interests of the European Union [online]. 1st ed. Budapest: Wolters Kluwer, 2022, pp. 165-169 [cit. 2023-08-10]. ISBN 978-963-594-122-3. Available at: https://euinv.uni-miskolc.hu/study.
Decision of the High Court of Cassation and Justice of Romania Ref. No. 594/RC/2022 [2022-11-17].
Decision of the High Court of Cassation and Justice of Romania Ref. No. 257/A/2022 [2022-12-09].
FEELEY, M. M. Criminal Justice as Regulation. New Criminal Law Review [online]. 2020, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 113-138 [cit. 2023-08-10]. ISSN 1933-4206. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1525/nclr.2020.23.1.113.
MAGHERESCU, D. Assessing the Means of Evidence by Forensic Reports in Criminal Cases of Business. Perspectives of Law and Public Administration [online]. 2022, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 532-544 [cit. 2023-08-10]. ISSN 2601-7830. Available at: http://www.adjuris.ro/revista/articole/An11nr4/6.%20Lucrare-2-Magherescu%20Delia%20EN.pdf.
MAGHERESCU, D. Teoria generală a expertizelor criminalistice. 1-a ed. Bucureşti: Hamangiu, 2021. 405 p. ISBN 978-606-27-1804-6.
OVERILL, R. E. and J. COLLIE. Quantitative Evaluation of the Results of Digital Forensic Investigations: A Review of Progress. Forensic Sciences Research [online]. 2021, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 13-18 [cit. 2023-08-10]. ISSN 2471-1411. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/20961790.2020.1837429.
SUMMERS, S. J. The Epistemic Ambitions of the Criminal Trial: Truth, Proof, and Rights. Quaestio facti [online]. 2023, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 249-272 [cit. 2023-08-10]. ISSN 2604-6202. Available at: https://doi.org/10.33115/udg_bib/qf.i1.22809.
Von LAMPE, K. The Illegal Cigarette Trade. In: M. NATARAJAN, ed. International and Transnational Crime and Justice [online]. 2nd ed. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2019, pp. 49-54 [cit. 2023-08-10]. ISBN 978-1-108-59729-6. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108597296.008.
WANTOŁA, M. Criminal Liability for Attempt. An Attempt at a New Perspective. Czasopismo Prawa Karnego i Nauk Penalnych [Journal of Criminal Law and Penal Studies] [online]. 2021, vol. 25, nr 4, pp. 69-93 [cit. 2023-08-10]. ISSN 2719-6569. Available at: https://www.czpk.pl/index.php/zeszyty-archiwum/michal-wantola-odpowiedzialnosc-karna-za-usilowanie-proba-nowego-spojrzenia.
YOUNGGREN, J. N., M. C. GOTTLIEB and C. L. BONESS. Forensic Consultation. In: C. A. FALENDER and E. P. SHAFRANSKE, eds. Consultation in Psychology: A Competency-based Approach [online]. 1st ed. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, 2020, pp. 239-251 [cit. 2023-08-10]. ISBN 978-1-4338-3141-6. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1037/0000153-014.
ZARAFIU, A. and C. BĂLAN. Despre posibilitatea pronunțării soluției de achitare în procedura simplificată a recunoașterii învinuirii. Doctrină și Jurisprudență. 2019, no. 1, pp. 157-170. ISSN 2501-8515.