Andrei Zarafiu
Úplný text príspevku
- Typ dokumentu: časopis
- Typ príspevku: štúdia
- Jazyk príspevku: angličtina
- Publikované: 31. 3. 2022
- Formát súboru: PDF
- Veľkosť súboru: 667 kB
In: Societas et iurisprudentia • 2022 • ročník 10 • číslo 1 • strany 36-49 • ISSN 1339-5467
Abstract: The judicial process of making decision in criminal cases is, generally speaking, increasingly analysed within a complex framework, one of these being harmonized with principles, and concepts organized along with the forensic activities of investigation. To this regard, the Romanian judicial activity in criminal cases is not away from these values of respecting standards in criminal proceedings. This situation is particularly viewed during the judgment phase of criminal proceedings at the stage of making decision. Taking into consideration all these aspects, the current paper is focused on the best practices of the activity of decision making in criminal cases in Romania, particular attention being paid to the forensic science and the way in which it influences the process of achieving decision in the framework of administering and assessing evidence based on forensic activity of investigation. An in-depth analysis of both the doctrine trends and the case-law presentation on the topic of decision making in criminal proceedings within the forensic framework in Romania will be presented, as well as the case-law remarks and comments of this topic. The idea of this paper was conducted by the fact that several criminal cases are usually solved by taking into account the involvement of forensic investigation records of gathering evidence which help judicial bodies in making decision in criminal proceedings.
Key Words: Criminal Law; Criminal Procedure Law; Criminal Matters; Court of Law; Making Decision; Criminal Proceedings; Criminal Cases; Judgment Phase; Forensic Investigation; Judicial Evidence; Scientific Evidence; Romania.
ORCID: 
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0932-9630
DOI: https://doi.org/10.31262/1339-5467/2022/10/1/36-49
URL: https://sei.iuridica.truni.sk/archive/2022/01/SEI-2022-01-Studies-Zarafiu-Andrei.pdf
Copyright © 2022 Andrei Zarafiu
Toto dielo je licencované pod Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Bibliografická citácia
ZARAFIU, A. Making Decision in Criminal Proceedings within a General Theory of Forensic Science in Romania. Societas et iurisprudentia [online]. 2022, roč. 10, č. 1, s. 36-49 [cit. 2020-01-01]. ISSN 1339-5467. Dostupné na: https://doi.org/10.31262/1339-5467/2022/10/1/36-49.
Zoznam bibliografických odkazov
Decision of the High Court of Cassation and Justice of Romania Ref. No. 312/A/2018 [2018-11-27].
Decision of the High Court of Cassation and Justice of Romania Ref. No. 20/A/2020 [2020-01-22].
Decision of the High Court of Cassation and Justice of Romania Ref. No. 62/A/2020 [2020-02-27].
Decision of the High Court of Cassation and Justice of Romania Ref. No. 126/A/2021 [2021-04-23].
Decision of the High Court of Cassation and Justice of Romania Ref. No. 140/A/2021 [2021-05-06].
Decision of the High Court of Cassation and Justice of Romania Ref. No. 168/A/2021 [2021-06-22].
Decision of the High Court of Cassation and Justice of Romania Ref. No. 174/A/2021 [2021-06-24].
Decision of the High Court of Cassation and Justice of Romania Ref. No. 22/RC/2021 [2021-01-21].
Decision of the High Court of Cassation and Justice of Romania Ref. No. 193/RC/2021 [2021-05-05].
Decision of the High Court of Cassation and Justice of Romania Ref. No. 431/RC/2021 [2021-10-14].
DONGOROZ, V., S. KAHANE, G. ANTONIU, C. BULAI, N. ILIESCU and R. STĂNOIU. Explicații teoretice ale Codului de procedură penală român: Partea specială: Vol. VI. 2-a ed. Bucureşti: All Beck, 2003. 443 p. ISBN 973-655-357-4.
European Convention on Human Rights.
Government Decision No. 368 of July 3, 1998, on Establishing the National Institute of Forensic Expertises [1998-07-03]. Official Journal of Romania, 1998, No. 248.
Government Decision No. 458 of April 15, 2009, on Modifying the Government Decision No. 368 of July 3, 1998, on Establishing the National Institute of Forensic Expertises [2009-04-15]. Official Journal of Romania, 2009, No. 276.
JELLEMA, H. The Reasonable Doubt Standard as Inference to the Best Explanation. Synthese [online]. 2021, vol. 199, no. 1-2, pp. 949-973 [cit. 2022-02-16]. ISSN 1573-0964. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-020-02743-8.
Law No. 135 of July 1, 2010, on the Code of Criminal Procedure [2010-07-01]. Official Journal of Romania, 2010, No. 486.
MAGHERESCU, D. Teoria generală a expertizelor criminalistice. 1-a ed. Bucureşti: Hamangiu, 2021. 405 p. ISBN 978-606-27-1804-6.
MULÁK, J. The Principle of the Public of Criminal Proceedings as an Attribute of the Right to a Fair Trial. The Lawyer Quarterly. 2021, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 518-533. ISSN 1805-8396.
PERGAMI, F. Next Generation EU and the Reform of Statutes of Limitation: Old and New Problems Regarding the Reasonable Length of Proceedings. KOINONIA. 2021, vol. 45, pp. 341-358. ISSN 0393-2230.
SMITH, A. and S. MADDAN. Misdemeanor Courts, due Process, and Case Outcomes. Criminal Justice Policy Review [online]. 2020, vol. 31, no. 9, pp. 1312-1339 [cit. 2022-02-16]. ISSN 1552-3586. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/0887403420901759.
STANCU, E. Tratat de criminalistică. 1-a ed. Bucureşti: Actami, 2001. 736 p. ISBN 973-9300-31-6.
STANCU, E. Tratat de criminalistică. 6-a ed. Bucureşti: Universul Juridic, 2015. 847 p. ISBN 978-606-673-673-2.
TELEKI, C. Applicability of Article 6(1) ECHR. In: C. TELEKI. Due Process and Fair Trial in EU Competition Law: The Impact of Article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights [online]. 1st ed. Leiden; Boston: Brill Nijhoff, 2021, pp. 101-128 [cit. 2022-02-16]. Nijhoff Studies in European Union Law, vol. 18. ISBN 978-90-04-44749-3. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004447493_008.
VOLONCIU, N. Tratat de procedură penală: Parte generală: Vol. I. 2-a ed. Bucureşti: Paideia, 1996. 511 p. ISBN 973-9131-01-8.