The Border between Employment Fiction and Discrimination: Reflection on the Employment of Pregnant Women from the Polish Perspective

Małgorzata Grześków

Úplný text príspevku

Vydanie vedeckého časopisu číslo 2022-03
Čítať príspevok (PDF)

  • Typ dokumentu: časopis
  • Typ príspevku: štúdia
  • Jazyk príspevku: angličtina
  • Publikované: 30. 9. 2022
  • Formát súboru: PDF
  • Veľkosť súboru: 788 kB

In: Societas et iurisprudentia • 2022 • ročník 10 • číslo 3 • strany 34-58 • ISSN 1339-5467

Abstract: The paper discusses the issue of the fine line between fictitious employment and discrimination. The presented study is a reflection from the Polish perspective. The purpose of this paper is to present the Polish regulation and authorities’ practices concerning the entitlement of women who began employment during pregnancy to social security benefits. The manuscript emphasizes that pregnancy does not create any presumption of fictitious employment, and the refusal to grant social security benefits to such women often leads to discrimination.

Key Words: Labour Law; Discrimination; Employment Fiction; Employment of Pregnant Women; Social Security; Poland.

ORCID: ORCID iDhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-8449-898X

DOI: https://doi.org/10.31262/1339-5467/2022/10/3/34-58

URL: https://sei.iuridica.truni.sk/archive/2022/03/SEI-2022-03-Studies-Grzeskow-Malgorzata.pdf

Autorské právaCopyright © 2022 Małgorzata Grześków

Licencia Creative CommonsToto dielo je licencované pod Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Bibliografická citácia

GRZEŚKÓW, M. The Border between Employment Fiction and Discrimination: Reflection on the Employment of Pregnant Women from the Polish Perspective. Societas et iurisprudentia [online]. 2022, roč. 10, č. 3, s. 34-58 [cit. 2020-01-01]. ISSN 1339-5467. Dostupné na: https://doi.org/10.31262/1339-5467/2022/10/3/34-58.

Zoznam bibliografických odkazov

Act of April 23, 1964 – Civil Code [1964]. Journal of Laws of Poland, 1964, no. 16, item 93.

Act of December 3, 2010, on the Implementation of Certain Provisions of the European Union on Equal Treatment [2010]. Journal of Laws of Poland, 2010, no. 254, item 1700.

Act of June 26, 1974 – Labour Code [1974]. Journal of Laws of Poland, 1974, no. 24, item 141.

Act of October 13, 1998, on the Social Insurance System [1998]. Journal of Laws of Poland, 1998, no. 137, item 887.

BARTOSZEWSKA, M. Art. 2a. [Zasada równego traktowania ubezpieczonych]. In: J. WANTOCH-REKOWSKI, red. Ustawa o systemie ubezpieczeń społecznych: Komentarz. 1. wyd. Warszawa: Wolters Kluwer, 2015, pp. 24-29. ISBN 978-83-264-3438-9.

BUREK, W. and W. KLAUS. Definiowanie dyskryminacji w prawie polskim w świetle prawa Unii Europejskiej oraz prawa międzynarodowego. Problemy Współczesnego Prawa Międzynarodowego, Europejskiego i Porównawczego [online]. 2013, vol. 11, pp. 72-90 [cit. 2022-08-05]. ISSN 1730-4504. Available at: https://doi.org/10.26106/j964-dd82.

BURRI, S. Protection and Rights Related to Pregnancy and Maternity in EU Law. Revue de droit comparé du travail et de la sécurité sociale [online]. 2019, n° 4, pp. 16-25 [cit. 2022-08-05]. ISSN 2262-9815. Available at: https://doi.org/10.4000/rdctss.1305.

Case of Caisse Nationale d’Assurance Vieillesse des Travailleurs Salariés (CNAVTS) v. Évelyne Thibault [1998-04-30]. Judgement of the Court of Justice of the European Union, 1998, C-136/95.

Case of Elisabeth Johanna Pacifica Dekker v. Stichting Vormingscentrum voor Jong Volwassenen (VJV-Centrum) Plus [1990-11-08]. Judgement of the Court of Justice of the European Union, 1990, C-177/88.

Case of Emel Boyraz v. Turkey [2014-12-02]. Judgement of the European Court of Human Rights, 2014, Application No. 61960/08.

Case of J. P. Jenkins v. Kingsgate (Clothing Productions) Ltd. [1981-03-31]. Judgement of the Court of Justice of the European Union, 1981, C-96/80.

Case of Joan Gillespie and Others v. Northern Health and Social Services Boards, Department of Health and Social Services, Eastern Health and Social Services Board and Southern Health and Social Services Board [1996-02-13]. Judgement of the Court of Justice of the European Union, 1996, C-342/93.

Case of Jurčić v. Croatia [2021-02-04]. Judgement of the European Court of Human Rights, 2021, Application No. 54711/15.

Case of Land Brandenburg v. Ursula Sass [2004-11-18]. Judgement of the Court of Justice of the European Union, 2004, C-284/02.

Case of Michelle K. Alabaster v. Woolwich plc and Secretary of State for Social Security [2004-03-30]. Judgement of the Court of Justice of the European Union, 2004, C-147/02.

Case of RE v. Praxair MRC SAS [2019-05-08]. Judgement of the Court of Justice of the European Union, 2019, C-486/18.

Case of Susanne Lewen v. Lothar Denda [1999-10-21]. Judgement of the Court of Justice of the European Union, 1999, C-333/97.

Case of WA v. Instituto Nacional de la Seguridad Social (INSS) [2019-12-12]. Judgement of the Court of Justice of the European Union, 2019, C-450/18.

Consolidated Version of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union: Part Three Union Policies and Internal Actions: Title X Social Policy: Article 157 [ex-Article 141 of the Treaty of the European Community]. OJ EU C 115, 2008-05-09, pp. 117-118.

Constitution of the Republic of Poland of April 2, 1997 [1997]. Journal of Laws of Poland, 1997, no. 78, item 483.

Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women [adopted and opened for signature, ratification and accession by the General Assembly Resolution 34/180 of 18 December 1979].

Council Directive 79/7/EEC of 19 December 1978 on the Progressive Implementation of the Principle of Equal Treatment for Men and Women in Matters of Social Security. OJ EC L 6, 1979-01-10, pp. 24-25.

Council Directive 86/613/EEC of 11 December 1986 on the Application of the Principle of Equal Treatment between Men and Women Engaged in an Activity, Including Agriculture, in a Self-employed Capacity, and on the Protection of Self-employed Women during Pregnancy and Motherhood. OJ EC L 359, 1986-12-19, pp. 56-58.

Council Directive 2000/43/EC of 29 June 2000 Implementing the Principle of Equal Treatment between Persons Irrespective of Racial or Ethnic Origin. OJ EC L 180, 2000-07-19, pp. 22-26.

Council Directive 2000/78/EC of 27 November 2000 Establishing a General Framework for Equal Treatment in Employment and Occupation. OJ EC L 303, 2000-12-02, pp. 16-22.

Council Directive 2004/113/EC of 13 December 2004 Implementing the Principle of Equal Treatment between Men and Women in the Access to and Supply of Goods and Services. OJ EU L 373, 2004-12-21, pp. 37-43.

CZURYK, M. Kwestionowanie przez Zakład Ubezpieczeń Społecznych wysokości wynagrodzenia za pracę stanowiącego podstawę wymiaru składek. In: M. CZURYK and K. NAUMOWICZ, red. Prawo ubezpieczeń społecznych: Wybrane problemy. 1. wyd. Olsztyn: Uniwersytet Warmińsko-Mazurski w Olsztynie, Wydział Prawa i Administracji, 2016, pp. 41-50. ISBN 978-83-62383-91-7.

Directive 95/46/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 October 1995 on the Protection of Individuals with Regard to the Processing of Personal Data and on the Free Movement of Such Data. OJ EC L 281, 1995-11-23, pp. 31-50.

Directive 2006/54/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 July 2006 on the Implementation of the Principle of Equal Opportunities and Equal Treatment of Men and Women in Matters of Employment and Occupation. OJ EU L 204, 2006-07-26, pp. 23-36.

DZIAMBOR, A., K. KAMIŃSKI, J. KORWIN-MIKKE, J. KULESZA and D. SOŚNIERZ. Interpelacja nr 3757 w sprawie masowych kontroli ZUS wobec kobiet prowadzących działalność gospodarczą. In: Sejm Rzeczypospolitej Polskiej [online]. 2020-03-30 [cit. 2022-08-05]. Available at: https://www.sejm.gov.pl/Sejm9.nsf/interpelacja.xsp?typ=INT&nr=3757.

FENWICK, H. and T. K. HERVEY. Sex Equality in the Single Market: New Directions for the European Court of Justice. Common Market Law Review [online]. 1995, vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 443-470 [cit. 2022-08-05]. ISSN 1875-8320. Available at: https://doi.org/10.54648/cola1995020.

FRYDRYCH, J., M. NYKIEL, Z. CZERNOW and K. MUNYAMA. Interpelacja nr 21659 do ministra rodziny i polityki społecznej w sprawie legalności kontroli ZUS. In: Sejm Rzeczypospolitej Polskiej [online]. 2021-03-17 [cit. 2022-08-05]. Available at: https://www.sejm.gov.pl/sejm9.nsf/InterpelacjaTresc.xsp?key=BZDBYU.

Gender Equality. In: United Nations [online]. 2022 [cit. 2022-08-05]. Available at: https://www.un.org/en/global-issues/gender-equality.

JAWORSKA, K. Główne cechy ubezpieczeń społecznych. In: M. CZURYK and K. NAUMOWICZ, red. Prawo ubezpieczeń społecznych: Wybrane problemy. 1. wyd. Olsztyn: Uniwersytet Warmińsko-Mazurski w Olsztynie, Wydział Prawa i Administracji, 2016, pp. 33-40. ISBN 978-83-62383-91-7.

Judgement of the Court of Appeal in Szczecin Ref. No. III AUa 354/21 [2021-12-09].

Judgement of the Court of Appeal in Warsaw Ref. No. III AUa 2740/13 [2015-05-27].

Judgement of the District Court in Częstochowa Ref. No. IV U 1371/18 [2019-04-12].

Judgement of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Poland Ref. No. I PKN 276/97 [1997-09-23].

Judgement of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Poland Ref. No. II UK 320/04 [2005-08-04].

Judgement of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Poland Ref. No. II UK 138/09 [2009-12-15].

Judgement of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Poland Ref. No. II UK 204/09 [2010-02-24].

Judgement of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Poland Ref. No. II UK 69/11 [2011-11-21].

KÖKKILINÇ ERALTUĞ, A. and G. KAYA. Transposing the EU Gender Equality Norms into the Turkish Labour Law: Where Do We Stand?. International Journal of Emerging and Transition Economies. 2008, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 41-58. ISSN 1308-2701.

LEWIS, P. Pregnant Workers and Sex Discrimination: The Limits of Purposive Non-comparative Methodology. International Journal of Comparative Labour Law and Industrial Relations [online]. 2000, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 55-69 [cit. 2022-08-05]. ISSN 1875-838X. Available at: https://doi.org/10.54648/260939.

Opracowania wieloletnie. In: Informator Statystyczny Wymiaru Sprawiedliwości [online]. 2022 [cit. 2022-08-05]. Available at: https://isws.ms.gov.pl/pl/baza-statystyczna/opracowania-wieloletnie/.

Report V(1): Maternity Protection at Work: Revision of the Maternity Protection Convention (Revised), 1952 (No. 103), and Recommendation, 1952 (No. 95). In: International Labour Organization [online]. Geneva: International Labour Office, 1999 [cit. 2022-08-05]. Available at: https://www.ilo.org/public/english/standards/relm/ilc/ilc87/rep-v-1.htm.

Resolution of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Poland Ref. No. I PZP 7/95 [1995-03-08].

Resolution of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Poland Ref. No. II UZP 1/10 [2010-04-21].

SZWED, S. Odpowiedź na interpelację nr 350 w sprawie kontroli w zakresie wypłacanych świadczeń przez ZUS. In: Sejm Rzeczypospolitej Polskiej [online]. 2020-01-17 [cit. 2022-08-05]. Available at: https://www.sejm.gov.pl/Sejm9.nsf/InterpelacjaTresc.xsp?key=BKZJUF.

SZWED, S. Odpowiedź na interpelację nr 3757 w sprawie masowych kontroli ZUS wobec kobiet prowadzących działalność gospodarczą. In: Sejm Rzeczypospolitej Polskiej [online]. 2020-05-20 [cit. 2022-08-05]. Available at: https://www.sejm.gov.pl/Sejm9.nsf/InterpelacjaTresc.xsp?key=BPTHY8.

TIMMER, A. and L. SENDEN. Gender Equality Law in Europe: How are EU Rules Transposed into National Law in 2016? [online]. 1st ed. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, 2016. 88 p. [cit. 2022-08-05]. ISBN 978-92-79-63354-6. Available at: https://doi.org/10.2838/63725.

Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union.

Universal Declaration of Human Rights [1948-12-10].