Viktor Križan
Úplný text príspevku
- Typ dokumentu: časopis
- Typ príspevku: štúdia
- Jazyk príspevku: angličtina
- Publikované: 31. 12. 2025
- Formát súboru: PDF
- Veľkosť súboru: 682 kB
In: Societas et iurisprudentia • 2025 • ročník 13 • číslo 4 • strany 44-65 • ISSN 1339-5467
Abstract: This article analyses the legal nature, scope, and justification of employer obligations under Slovakia’s supplementary pension savings scheme (the third pillar), as regulated by the Act No. 650/2004 Coll. It places these duties within the post-2003 multi-pillar reform and the hybrid design of the third pillar, combining voluntary participation with mandatory employer and employee involvement for selected occupational groups. The paper details the employer’s core duties – concluding an employer agreement, enrolling eligible employees, remitting statutory minimum contributions, and meeting administrative and equal-treatment requirements – drawing primarily on systematic and teleological interpretation of the Act and the constitutional right to adequate material security in old age under the Article 39(1) of the Slovak Constitution. It argues that mandatory contributions for hazardous or physiologically limited professions serve legitimate compensatory and preventive aims, yet interfere with contractual autonomy and may produce economic and competitive distortions. The article, therefore, identifies proportionality-based limits to the current model and outlines de lege ferenda options to recalibrate mandatory participation, strengthen review mechanisms, and enhance flexibility and incentives.
Key Words: Social Security Law; Supplementary Pension Savings; Third Pillar; Employer Obligations; Mandatory Participation; Hazardous Work; Contractual Autonomy; Proportionality; Slovak Pension Reform; Act No. 650/2004 Coll.; Constitutional Right to Old-age Security; the Slovak Republic.
Scopus Author ID: 59147138300
Web of Science ResearcherID: N-2209-2015
ORCID:
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3184-4647
DOI: https://doi.org/10.31262/1339-5467/2025/13/4/44-65
URL: https://sei.iuridica.truni.sk/archive/2025/04/SEI-2025-04-Studies-Krizan-Viktor.pdf
Copyright © 2025 Viktor Križan
Toto dielo je licencované pod Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Bibliografická citácia
KRIŽAN, V. Employer Obligations in the Supplementary Pension Scheme in the Slovak Republic. Societas et iurisprudentia [online]. 2025, roč. 13, č. 4, s. 44-65 [cit. 2020-01-01]. ISSN 1339-5467. Dostupné na: https://doi.org/10.31262/1339-5467/2025/13/4/44-65.
Zoznam bibliografických odkazov
Act No. 43/2004 Coll. on Old-age Pension Savings and on Amendments to Certain Acts, as amended.
Act No. 100/1988 Coll. on Social Security [effective until 31 December 2003].
Act No. 355/2007 Coll. on the Protection, Support and Development of Public Health and on Amendments to Certain Acts, as amended.
Act No. 461/2003 Coll. on Social Insurance, as amended.
Act No. 595/2003 Coll. on Income Tax, as amended.
Act No. 650/2004 Coll. on Supplementary Pension Savings and on Amendments to Certain Acts, as amended.
Constitutional Act No. 460/1992 Coll. Constitution of the Slovak Republic, as amended.
European Social Charter [1961].
LACKO, M. Hmotné zabezpečenie v starobe. 1. vyd. Bratislava: Sprint dva, 2011. 120 p. ISBN 978-80-89393-65-7.
LACKO, M. Poistná zásada vo svetle aktuálnych zmien. Právny obzor. 2011, roč. 94, č. 1, pp. 86-94. ISSN 0032-6984.
LACKO, M. Slovak Social Security Law. 1. vyd. Plzeň: Vydavatelství a nakladatelství Aleš Čeněk, 2010. 111 p. ISBN 978-80-7380-259-2.
MACKOVÁ, Z. Dvadsať rokov transformácie sociálneho zabezpečenia (Jeden krok vpred, dva kroky vzad alebo od sociálneho zabezpečenia cez sociálne poistenie, ba dokonca sporenie opätovne k sociálnemu zabezpečeniu na úrovni životného minima – t.j. k odvodovému bonusu?). Právny obzor. 2011, roč. 94, č. 1, pp. 25-65. ISSN 0032-6984.
SCHNEIDER, S. M., T. PETROVA and U. BECKER, eds. Pension Maps: Visualising the Institutional Structure of Old Age Security in Europe and Beyond [online]. 2nd ed. Munich: Max Planck Institute for Social Law and Social Policy, 2021. 545 p. [cit. 2025-11-03]. Available at: https://doi.org/10.17617/2.3359088.
SLEZÁKOVÁ, A. Komparácia zákonných podmienok pre distribúciu doplnkového dôchodkového sporenia v SR a doplnkového penzijného sporenia v ČR. Studia Iuridica Cassoviensia [online]. 2021, roč. 9, č. 1, pp. 85-94 [cit. 2025-11-03]. ISSN 1339-3995. Available at: https://doi.org/10.33542/SIC2021-1-07.
SLEZÁKOVÁ, A. Právne inštitúty a návrhy de lege ferenda potenciálne vedúce k zvýšeniu účasti na doplnkovom dôchodkovom sporení. Studia Iuridica Cassoviensia [online]. 2017, roč. 5, č. 2, pp. 98-110 [cit. 2025-11-03]. ISSN 1339-3995. Available at: https://sic.pravo.upjs.sk/files/9_slezakova-_faktory_motivujuce_k_uzavretiu.pdf.
